A Class Divided Documentary Review

A class divided is a documentary or so a get a lineer named Jane Elliot who get windes her students or so racism first hand. She divides the students into ii groups, the game eye, and the brown eye. For the first day, the brown eyeball children are not able to go to recess, or lunch at the same time as the rest of the children. They wear a blue collar most their necks so that they are obviously varied at a distance from the early(a) students. They are not allowed to drink from the same water fountains, office the playground equipment, or even play with the blue interpret children.The next day, the exercises are reversed. During these two years Jane Elliot would make comments astir(predicate) the children wearing the collars to de pose them. She would point out if one of them wasnt ready on time, or if they forgot something. She would say things equal Thats how blue eyed wad are Brown eyed concourse are correct than blue eyed deal (J. Elliot, A carve up Divided, 1985). After the children who werent wearing a collar noticed Mrs. Elliot grammatical construction these kinds of things, they would in each case chime in and begin saying things about the kids wearing the collars.Mrs. Elliot said I watched wonderful, persuasionful, children turn into nasty, vicious, discriminating little third graders. (J. Elliot, A Class Divided, 1985) . The mental picture showed the students go in back for their fifteenth class reunion to talk about this life ample lesson that their third grade teacher taught them. All of the students said it was a lesson they read never forgotten and something that changed their lives forever. They talked about how it affected their lives growing up, and how it affects the way they raised or were currently raising their children.Since she got done teaching, Jane has been doing trainings are conferences to teach others. Her movie A Class Divided has been shown in prisons to inmates who are trying to earn a degree. She als o did training at a prison in Iowa for the guards and other staff members. When people signed into the coming upon they had to log whether they had brown eyes or blue eyes. Those with blue eyes had to wear a unfledged ribbon. The people with brown eyes were able to go in and sit when the training was scheduled to start, where the blue eyed people had to stand out in the hall. The bathrooms were labeled browns only.The blue eyes werent told what was going on, they were just told to wait outside, and administration would come out and tell them to be quiet. Meanwhile, Jane Elliot talked to those with brown eyes and told them that they were not to allow blue eyed people to sit beside them. She told them that brown eyed people were better than blue eyed people. She said that blue eyed people were no unplayful and the brown eyes were to treat them as such. A while after the meeting started the blue eyes were able to come into the room. They had to sit in the back, and some people didnt even have a seat.During the meeting Jane talked to the people with blue eyes a batch like she did to her students 30 years ago. The reaction she got from the adults were a lot like they were in her experiment with the children, however on that point was one woman who was a lot much out spoken and rebellious toward Jane. Jane Elliot does a great job at not only grievous people about racism and discrimination, solely also showing how it affects us, and how easy it is to go with the crowd. Some of the movie takes place in a school, and this is a place where children are taught to socialize.Teachers play a huge role in how students are molded, especially at such a young age. In this day and age, I dont rally teachers really think about how much of an influence they are on their students. Most of the children spend more time with their teachers than they do with their own parents. Jane took on this role and helped her students understand that there is an issue with discrimination a nd taught them a valuable lesson. When this documentary was filmed not everyone was taught that the color of your skin doesnt make up the type of person that you are.They were taught that if you are not white, you arent normal. They associated people that had a different skin color as bad or even stupid. In those generation it was totally congenial and some people sincerely believed this. Things that are social bankable change everyplace time and this is something that has changed in a big way. Im not saying that everyone doesnt distribute about the color of your skin. There is a lot of racism going on in our homo today, but it is no where near as bad as it was forty years ago.It reflects what we are taught by our parents also. If we are taught that black people are bad then we are going to believe that they are, and look at all of the bad things they do. We like to be the same as everyone else we do not like to stand out. In the film a lot of people didnt dare to stand up for those wearing a collar because that would require them to stand up and go against what the authoritative figure was saying. This television system relates to several chapters in our sociology book, the main chapter being chapter ten, race and ethnicity.This movie focused on the struggle in our country with discrimination of those with a different skin color, concentrating on blacks being the minority. At the time, people thought of black people are dirty, stupid, and bad people. They didnt think they were able to do anything as good as white people. Jane Elliot turned her classroom into a baseborn discriminating society in a sense. She had the brown eyed students wear blue collars the first day and they were not able to do any of the same things that the blue eyed students did.She divided this class that was once a united class who vie together, into a class that was split into two groups and mocked and made fun of each other, solely because of the color of their eyes. I also th ink we could relate this movie to chapter fourteen, where the book talks about education. alike(p) I have stated before, teachers play a major role in their interaction with their students and how they can be molded. Jane talked about going over the phonics card packs with the brown eyed students on the day that they wore the collars around their necks and it took them five and a half transactions to get through the card pack.On the day that they didnt wear the collar around their necks, and were treated with respect and felt as though they were sufficient, they only took two and a half minutes to get through the card pack. Jane talked about the time she performed this exercise for the second time with her third grade class. She said that the students score went up on the age where they were on top and went down on the days they were on bottom. After going through the exercise their overall scores would have a significant incline. Mrs.Elliot sent the results to Stanford Universit ys Psychology Department to have them study and examine why this would be so. We could also relate this video to chapter seventeen, which talks about social change collective behavior, social movements and technology. Like I said, things that were once socially acceptable in those times are no longer acceptable now. In those days it was ok for people to say the word nigger it was a term that people used for black people because thats the term everyone else was using. Now, it is considered a derogatory word and it is not acceptable to say it.I thought that this documentary was very interesting. I loved what Jane Elliot did with her students. I wish it was something more teachers could do, but now-a-days it probably couldnt be done because of the stink people would put up about it. I feel that some teachers spend too much time talking about topics and not close enough actually teaching. Jane taught her students a lesson that they have remembered and will never forget. It is something that they have taught or will teach to their children. The town I grew up in was quite a bit like Riceville, Iowa. It was a small town, primarily Christians who were white.In fact, there were only two black people in our town and they happened to be two of my cousins who were adopted. From as far as I can remember I was taught that skin color doesnt make up who the person is, Its what is on the inside that counts. My cousins and I had a great consanguinity with my cousins and it wasnt because of the color of their skin, or the color of mine that made the difference. I have met black people who I didnt like, and I have met white people who I didnt like. To me color makes no difference. I am very grateful that I was taught this lesson, and I feel and for those who havent been taught.I think it would be incredibly useful for this to be used in school. There are many other forms of discrimination other than people with different skin colors. Just because it is the form that is most w idely talked about doesnt mean it is the only one. I hope in some way, maybe not by putting collars around their necks, but I do hope that this is taught in schools through out the years. References Peters, William. (1985). A Class Divided. PBS, Frontline Benokraitis, Nijole. V. (2012). SOC, (Student Edition) Belmont, CA Wadsworth, Cengage Learning